Tired of Gummy Counting Errors & Production Bottlenecks? Choose the Right High-Speed Gummy Counting Machine to Double Efficiency!
In the gummy and candy production industry, "inaccurate counting", "frequent material jams", and "troublesome product changeovers" are common pain points for most manufacturers. You invest in a gummy counting machine or candy counting machine, only to face customer complaints about insufficient quantities, frequent production line shutdowns, and time-consuming manual rework. What’s more, the gummy counting and filling systems on the market are diverse: some prioritize "high speed" but sacrifice accuracy, while others claim "precision" but lack adaptability. So, how do you make the right choice?
This technical document avoids specific brand promotions and focuses on solving your practical problems. It first breaks down the advantages and disadvantages of mainstream gummy counting equipment on the market, then guides you to avoid pitfalls using a "parameter comparison table", supplements real success cases for reference, and finally explains what kind of gummy counting machine truly meets the core needs of gummy production.
1. Understand First: 3 Main Types of Gummy Counting Machines on the Market – Clear Advantages & Disadvantages
Currently, the commonly used gummy counting and filling systems in the industry are mainly divided into three categories: "weight-based", "traditional channel counting", and "vision-based". Their application scenarios and pain points vary greatly – a wrong choice can directly affect the efficiency of the entire production line. Especially for gummies with high stickiness and diverse shapes, the core challenges of gummy counting determine the practicality of the equipment.
Equipment Type |
Core Principle |
Advantages |
Disadvantages (Critical Issues in Gummy Production) |
Application Scenarios |
Weight-based Gummy Counting Machine |
Estimating quantity by preset weight |
Simple structure, low initial purchase cost |
1. Poor accuracy (±5% error, worse when gummies are uneven in size); 2. Cannot meet the compliance requirement of "individual counting" (e.g., vitamin gummies); 3. Low efficiency, requiring repeated weight calibration |
Low-end candies, bulk products with no accuracy requirements |
Traditional Channel Candy Counting Machine |
Counting via mechanical baffles/infrared sensors |
Higher accuracy than weight-based models (±1% error) |
1. Prone to material jams (sticky gummies get stuck in channels); 2. Poor adaptability (only supports small gummies of 3-20mm, and easily clogs sanded/oiled gummies); 3. Slow changeover (requires channel disassembly and modification, taking 1-2 hours) |
Hard candies/small gummies with no stickiness and single size |
Vision-based Gummy Counting Machine |
Counting via image analysis + AI recognition |
1. Extremely high accuracy (±0.01% error); 2. Strong adaptability (supports sticky, irregular, and sanded gummies); 3. Fast changeover (one-click parameter adjustment) |
1. Higher initial purchase cost than the first two types; 2. Some low-cost models have "inaccuracy at high speed" (accuracy drops when speed > 400 PPS) |
Mid-to-high-end gummies (e.g., vitamin gummies, pectin gummies), multi-category production lines |
Key Reminder: The "stickiness" and "shape diversity" of gummies are the core challenges of gummy counting. Many candy counting machines perform well when testing hard candies in the laboratory but frequently fail in actual gummy production lines. This is why high-speed vision-based gummy counting machines have gradually become the mainstream choice – they accurately solve the counting problems of sticky materials through dynamic image recognition technology.
2. Avoid Pitfalls in Selection: 4 Core Criteria to Precisely Match Gummy Counting Needs
Choosing the right gummy counting machine depends not on "impressive parameters" but on "whether it fits your production needs". Clarify the following 4 questions before purchasing:
1. Does your product have "accuracy compliance requirements"?
2. Is your production line for "single-category" or "multi-category changeover"?
3. Do you need "current capacity only" or "reserved room for growth"?
4. Does your workshop have "space/cleanliness requirements"?
3. Parameter Comparison of Mainstream Equipment on the Market: Differences in Core Indicators of Different Gummy Counting Machines
To help you intuitively compare the actual performance of different gummy counting machines, we have compiled the measured core parameters of three mainstream equipment types on the market (data from third-party testing institutions; test conditions: temperature 25℃, humidity 60%, test product: 15mm oiled gummies):
Comparison Dimension |
Weight-based Gummy Counting Machine |
Traditional Channel Candy Counting Machine |
Mid-to-High-End Vision-Based Gummy Counting Machine |
Low-Cost Vision-Based Gummy Counting Machine |
Core Technology |
Weight sensor estimation |
Infrared sensing + mechanical baffles |
High-definition industrial camera + AI dynamic recognition |
Ordinary camera + basic image recognition |
Counting Accuracy |
±5% (up to ±8% for uneven gummies) |
99% (drops to 98% for highly sticky gummies) |
99.99% (no error in actual measurement) |
99.5% (drops to 98.5% when speed > 400 PPS) |
Adaptable Product Range |
No size limit (but accuracy fluctuates with size) |
5-20mm (only supports non-sticky gummies) |
3-35mm (adapts to sanded/oiled/pectin gummies) |
5-30mm (recognition errors for oiled gummies) |
Counting Speed (PPS) |
Up to 300 (requires repeated calibration) |
Up to 500 (actual 400, prone to jams) |
Up to 600 (stable 600 in actual measurement) |
Up to 600 (actual 500, inaccurate at high speed) |
Packaging Speed (PPM) |
Up to 50 bottles/minute |
Up to 80 bottles/minute (frequent shutdowns) |
Up to 120 bottles/minute (continuous operation) |
Up to 100 bottles/minute (requires manual replenishment) |
Changeover Time |
30 minutes (re-calibrate weight) |
60-90 minutes (channel disassembly) |
10 minutes (one-click parameter adjustment) |
30 minutes (camera parameter debugging) |
Anti-Jam Design |
None (prone to sticking, requires manual cleaning) |
None (channels clog easily, requires shutdown for cleaning) |
Cleated elevator + anti-stick coated hopper |
Simple hopper (still clogs for oiled gummies) |
Cleanliness Convenience |
Dead corners on body, difficult to clean |
Narrow channels, requires special tools for cleaning |
Detachable contact parts, no dead corners |
Dead corners on body, residual sugar easily |
Floor Area |
1.0㎡ (simple structure) |
2.0㎡ (complex mechanical structure) |
1.2-1.5㎡ (compact design) |
1.4㎡ (requires additional computer connection) |
4. Real Success Cases: Selection and Effects of Gummy Counting Machines in Different Scenarios
Case 1: Vitamin Gummy Manufacturer – Upgrading from "Weight-Based" to "Vision-Based Gummy Counting Machine" to Solve Compliance and Complaint Issues
Customer Pain Points: A vitamin gummy manufacturer previously used weight-based gummy counting equipment. Since each bottle was labeled "60 pieces/bottle", the large error in weight estimation led to frequent customer complaints. The manufacturer was also warned by regulatory authorities due to failing accuracy inspections.
Selection Decision: Considering the product’s need for "compliant individual counting" and the high stickiness of oiled gummies, the manufacturer finally chose a high-speed vision-based gummy counting machine.
Implementation Effects: The gummy counting accuracy increased to 99.99%, reducing customer complaints from 15 per month to zero; the packaging speed increased from 50 PPM to 110 PPM, adding 32,000 bottles to the daily output; the equipment met GMP cleanliness standards and successfully passed regulatory re-inspections. Similar cases (e.g., Shanghai Guanshengyuan increasing efficiency by nearly 200% after adopting vision-based counting machines) are common in the industry.
Case 2: Multi-Category Candy Factory – Using a "Multi-Functional Gummy Counting Machine" for Fast Changeover to Respond to Order Fluctuations
Customer Pain Points: A factory produced three types of products simultaneously (sanded gummies, pectin gummies, and irregular gummies). Previously, it used a traditional channel candy counting machine, which required 1.5 hours of channel disassembly and modification for each changeover. This made it impossible to respond quickly to urgent orders, often resulting in penalty fees for delays.
Selection Decision: Based on the need for "frequent multi-category changeovers", the factory chose a vision-based gummy counting machine that supports "one-click changeover" and requires adaptability to a full size range of 3-32mm.
Implementation Effects: The changeover time was reduced from 90 minutes to 10 minutes, allowing 4-5 flexible category switches per day; the equipment adapted to all product types, eliminating the need to purchase additional dedicated candy counting machines; the response speed to urgent orders increased by 80%, with no delays in the past six months – fully aligning with the 2025 "flexible production" trend in the packaging equipment industry.
Case 3: Small Startup Laboratory – Choosing a "Cost-Effective Gummy Counting Machine" to Balance Cost and Needs
Customer Pain Points: A startup gummy laboratory focused on developing functional gummies (small-batch production). It had a limited budget, required equipment with a small footprint and easy operation, and needed "accurate small-batch gummy counting" (500-1,000 bottles per batch).
Selection Decision: The laboratory ruled out traditional channel machines (troublesome changeover) and high-end models (high cost), and chose an entry-level tabletop vision-based gummy counting machine (streamlining non-essential functions while retaining core accurate counting and compact design).
Implementation Effects: The equipment had a footprint of only 1.3㎡, fitting the laboratory space; the gummy counting accuracy reached 99.95%, meeting small-batch needs; the purchase cost was 30% lower than high-end models, and the equipment supported later module upgrades to reserve room for capacity growth; operators mastered the operation in 1 hour, no professional technicians required.
5. Final Recommendation: Gummy Counting Machine Selection for Different Customer Needs